Thursday 11 December 2014









Wednesday 13 June 2012

The Emperor of Clay - Nadal


 French Open 2012: Rafael Nadal finally sees off Novak Djokovic to clinch a record seventh title

The King of Clay now
The Emperor of Clay

Nadal is widely regarded as one of the greatest players in tennis. He wins on all three court surfaces on which the world’s four most important tennis tournaments are played: the grass of Wimbledon, the hard acrylic composition used at the Australian Open and the U.S. Open and, especially, the soft red clay of the French Open. In fact, he has acquired the nickname “The King of Clay.”
What is it about Nadal that makes him dominant on all surfaces but nearly unbeatable on clay? The answers include legs as thick as telephone poles and a forehand that produces, on average, 3,300 revolutions per minute of dizzying spin.
Leg strength is more important on clay than any other surface, the basis of all movement. Gil Reyes, a fitness trainer who worked with Andre Agassi, among others, noted that while clay might look fun at home, might appear cushiony, moving on it is like “playing tennis on a hardwood floor in socks.”
Legs, Reyes said, stabilize players’ skeletons on clay and relieve the inevitable tension the instability places on the back. “On clay, Nadal’s inner thighs are particularly important,” Reyes said. “They allow him to unload his holsters with his feet so far apart, in those rare instances he’s off-balance. And not just the strength to hit, but over and over again.”
Patrick McEnroe, general manager for development at the United States Tennis Association, said Nadal’s positioning helped create spin. “That’s what separates him: how heavy his forehand is, just the r.p.m.’s it generates.” 
When they say heavy, they mean it literally. The average professional men’s tennis player hits a forehand that spins at 2,700 revolutions per minute. Nadal’s spins at 600 r.p.m.’s greater on average and clears the net at a far greater height. Because of his racket speed, because of the revolutions produced, because new string technology generates more spin, his forehand kicks higher in the air and with a less predictable bounce, chunks of clay flying this way and that.

A Relentless, Muscular Playing Style

Nadal’s never-say-die playing style, one that involves covering every inch of the court and often several feet beyond the baseline and doubles alleys, has battered opponents into submission in his rise to the top. It has also battered his knees through cumulative wear and tear.
The effect of this tenacious physicality is compounded by the number of matches Nadal plays; he enters nearly every tournament, and usually reaches the finals.
Because Nadal is so muscled-up and explosive, his best tennis looks not like a gift from heaven but instead like the product of ferocious will. His victories and his taped-up knees and his years as a very good No. 2 in the world all resonate together, as though the rewards and the wages of individual effort had been animated in a single human being: if you hurl yourself at a particular goal furiously enough and long enough you may tear your body up in the process, but you may get there after all.
 


Background

rafel nadal
Rafael Nadal was born in 1986 in Majorca, an island in the Mediterranean off the coast of Spain. He still lives there, in a nontouristy little city called Manacor, about 15 miles from the beach. A four-story building has served for many years as an informal family compound, housing Rafael’s parents, his younger sister, his grandparents and various other relations.
Rafael began playing tennis at age 3, coached by his uncle, Toni Nadal. There was a lot more soccer than tennis during Rafael’s early childhood; the family apartment hallways and local streets served for ballhandling practice and, before long, he was the leading scorer even on teams of boys older than he was.
By the time he was 11, Rafael was playing competitive tennis regularly, but he was still grasping the racket two-handed, for forehand and backhand alike. He recalled that while he did most things with his right hand, his physical strength seemed concentrated on the left, which is how he became a left-handed player.
When he won the 2005 French Open at 19, he became the first teenager to win a Grand Slam since Pete Sampras in 1990


Saturday 9 June 2012

Suni Narine - The Mystery Man



The West Indies batsmen didn't care much for spin bowling, either. They thought it was there to be savaged, and for the most part it was, even though seven of West Indies' 17 Test defeats during those 15 years of omnipotence were the result of dramatic collapses against spin bowling: some great (Shane Warne, Abdul Qadir), some good (Narendra Hirwani, Phil Tufnell) and some inexplicable (Allan Border, Bob Holland, Murray Bennett).

That was then and this is now. Just as India started to produce a series of fast bowlers in the 1990s, so the DNA of West Indian cricket is changing. A number of West Indies' brightest hopes are slow bowlers. With 2,764 days of the 2010s remaining, West Indian spinners have already taken more Test wickets in this decade than they did in the 1980s: 113 to 100, and in a quarter of the matches (21 to 82). Devendra Bishoo was the ICC Emerging Player of the Year in 2011; in April, Shane Shillingford became the first West Indian spinner to take 10 wickets in a Test since the great Lance Gibbs in 1966; and the mystery spinner Sunil Narine was the player of the season at the recent IPL.

Narine should made his Test debut at Edgbaston. In the best traditions of mystery spin, he has played only a few first-class matches. It might be the most keenly awaited Test debut in this country since Graeme Hick 21 years ago. Hick was terrorised and traumatised by fast men. Not any more. After the fast comes the new Ramadhin. Narine has been compared to the brilliant Sonny Ramadhin, another unorthodox off-spinner from Trinidad who shredded England in tandem with Alf Valentine in 1950.
The first thing that strikes you about Narine – apart from his trademark mohawk – is the numbers. Thirty-four first-class wickets at an average of 11.88, 14 at 20 in one-day internationals (with a 1980s economy rate of 3.79) and 46 at 14.04 in Twenty20 cricket (economy rate: 5.20). There is another number of note. Narine's life changed when he was bought for $700,000 by the Kolkata Knight Riders. It seemed like an almighty gamble on an unknown who was almost an oxymoron: a West Indian slowbowler. In fact it was a masterstroke; Narine was close to unhittable and starred as KKR won their first IPL. In the league stage he bowled Sachin Tendulkar with one of the balls of the tournament.

Narine's IPL business meant he missed the Test series against Australia. Sir Vivian Richards thinks West Indies might have won had he played. He did appear against Australia in the ODIs, consistently befuddling their top order. Sorry to go back to the numbers, but they are outrageous: Narine took 11 wickets at 14.45, with a 1970s economy rate of 3.32. Here's a video of those wickets. Nobody was harassed as much as the wicketkeeper Matthew Wade. He made two runs from 20 balls and was dismissed three times.
Narine's most famous weapon is his knuckle ball, which spits the wrong way off the pitch. He is also harder to read than Ulysses with a hangover, primarily because he often bowls with a scrambled seam. Narine has a lot more in his armoury besides mystery. He complements his wizardry with the accuracy of Merlyn – the bowling machine, that is. He also gets considerable bounce and turn and, according to the KKR bowling coach Wasim Akram, "has the ability to read batsmen's minds and bowl accordingly".
It is the mystery that most engages us, of course. The seductive appeal of such bowlers will never fade. They could be the femmes fatale of cricket, duplicitous and deadly. Ever since Bernard Bosanquet first bowled his googly – "it is not unfair," he said, "only immoral" – the world of unorthodox and mystery spin has captivated cricket fans. It's often little more than smoke and doosras – part of the pre-Ashes ritual in the 1990s involved Shane Warne telling the world he had a new delivery, before shredding England with the same old beastly legbreak – but we are happy to suppress tedious reality in favour of a magical world of googlies, doosras, flippers, knuckle balls, teesras, zooters, blooters and deliveries that tell us the time in Los Angeles.
As they consider facing Narine, some of the England batsmen might not share this enthusiasm. They had a diabolical time against Saeed Ajmal in the winter, none more so than Ian Bell: he made 17 runs and was dismissed four times for an Ajverage of 4.25. The fact England struggled against all spin in the winter – even the modest Rangana Herath – suggested a mental block rather than an intrinsic problem with unorthodox spin, although Bell in particular was unable to pick Ajmal's doosra. Even the best can have problems with mystery spin, however. When Allan Border faced a young Muttiah Muralitharan in 1992, he was originally convinced he was facing a leg-spinner who kept bowling googlies.
Ajmal and Murali prove Gideon Haigh's quote that "mystery is temporary, mastery permanent". In cricket, there is no existence more precarious than that of the mystery spinner. There are plenty of poignant stories of those who, after a stunning start, were demystified and had mediocrity thrust upon them. In his debut Test series in 2008, Mendis skelped India's formidable batting lineup with 26 wickets at 18.38 in three matches. Since then he has taken 36 in 13 Tests at an average of 42.66. His last Test appearance was 13 months ago. The case of the Indian leg-spinner Laxman Sivaramakrishnan in the 1980s was even more extreme. In his second and third Tests he took three consecutive six-fors against England. He played six more Tests in his career and took seven wickets at 104.14.
There is a sense that West Indies need to strike while Narine's hot, before batsmen work him out. Yet he may have enough mastery to go with his mystery. The consensus is that he is much more accurate than Mendis, and gets significantly more turn and bounce. The other issue is how he adapts to Test cricket; to being the hunter rather than the hunted. Ultimately, when it comes to mystery spin, nobody knows anything. It would not be a huge shock if Narine took six for 40 or one for 140 in his first Test innings. You could not say that of many bowlers, but then mystery spinners have always been a breed unto themselves.

Sachin Tendulkar - Interesting Facts


Here are some interesting stories for all the god’s fan….
1.Sachin was given a pair of pads by his cricket hero Sunil Gavaskar when he was a schoolboy – and he made his Test debut for India against Pakistan aged just 16-years old in 1989 wearing those very pads…..
2.Like loads of other cricketers, Sachin is pretty superstitious – he’ll always put on his left pad before his right whenever he’s getting padded up……
3.“He hasn’t spent Diwali at home since we got married. But it really doesn’t matter that it’s Diwali… any time he spends at home is great!” – Anjali, his wife, told once…
Once in a BBC interview when asked about his dream women, Sachin answered ‘my wife’ without batting an eyelid.
4.”He scored a fantastic 148 in Shane Warne’s debut Test in Sydney and then followed it up with another century at Perth, one of the toughest pitches in the world, where Indians have traditionally struggled. The value of his hundred increased because all the other Indian batsmen struggled.
His weakness is the fact that he is so talented. His adrenaline pumps strongly when he walks out to bat with the noise of the crowds. You can’t hear yourself think with that noise.
I would pay $1000 to watch Sachin bat.
To score a 148 at Sydney – and that too when you are 18 — was out of the ordinary though the wicket was a lot like the ones you encounter in India, flat with lots of runs for the taking…….”
The above facts are told by Allan Border.
5.The entire cricket world is convinced of one thing : Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar is the world’s best batsman. Not just for his extraordinary skill, not just for his ability to tear even the most formidable of bowling attacks to shreds; but also for a rare never-say-die spirit, an insatiable hunger for runs and victory, a desire to dominate the opponent ; commitment, dedication …
These are what the little champion has built his reputation on. ..